Because the obligation is to report the account, according to the dissent, the government may impose a penalty per-account.Ĭontextual Clues Identified by the Majority to Support Its Reading Pointing to the regulations, the dissent also identified that the FBAR form is not the “report” but simply the procedural tool used to implement the reporting duty. The statute’s pattern of account-specific language meant the nonwillful penalty must also operate on a per-account basis, Justice Barrett wrote. The dissent, instead, favored the canon that “identical words used in different parts of the same statute are generally presumed to have the same meaning.” Slip op. In other words, if Congress wanted to tie penalties to account-level information, it knew how to do so, but did not. Justice Gorsuch leaned on the canon that, “When Congress includes particular language in one section of a statute but omits it from a neighbor, we normally understand that difference in language to convey a difference in meaning ( expressio unius est exclusio alterius).” Slip op. The majority rejected the government’s theory that because the statute authorizes per-account penalties for some willful violations, and has an account-specific reasonable cause exception, the Court should infer Congress meant nonwillful violations to be account-specific too. Because the duty is to file reports, the penalty accrues per-FBAR report. Thus, the statute establishes a binary duty-either one files a compliant report, or one does not. Section 5314 does not speak of accounts or their number but rather the legal duty to file reports” that include information about a person’s foreign “transaction or relationship.” Slip op. Justice Gorsuch, writing for the majority, observed, “Immediately, one thing becomes clear. person makes a transaction or maintains a relation for any person with a foreign financial agency.” For “any violation” of this reporting duty, § 5321 authorizes a civil penalty up to $10,000. citizens “to keep records, file reports, or keep records and file reports, when the. § 5314, directs the Secretary of the Treasury to require U.S. The statute at issue, the Bank Secrecy Act, 31 U.S.C. Not surprisingly, the Court’s analysis began with the terms of the statute itself. Astute taxpayers, tax advisors, and tax litigators will apply insights from this latest opinion - reviewed in this alert - in providing tax advice and developing advocacy strategies. The case once again highlights that the rules of statutory construction are not merely academic. Justice Barrett wrote a dissenting opinion, joined by Justices Thomas, Sotomayor, and Kagan. In an unusual line-up, Justice Gorsuch led a majority that included Justices Jackson, Alito, Kavanaugh, and Roberts. The Justices’ differing interpretations led them into a split decision. Like many tax cases, this case required the Court to decide how best to read a statute. The taxpayer avoided a $2.7 million penalty tied to 272 separate foreign accounts. As a result, the penalty at issue in the case is capped at $50,000 for failure to timely file FBAR forms for five years. United States, ruling that the Bank Secrecy Act’s $10,000 maximum penalty for a nonwillful failure to file a timely and accurate FBAR report accrues on a per-FBAR report, not a per-account, basis. Versus Tufts in the championship game her 2-run HR in the third inning was the difference in the Ephs 3-1 victory.Today, the Supreme Court issued a 5-4 decision in Bittner v. In game 2 versus Bates she reached on a fielder's choice and then scored the Ephs first run when Sydney Fleming doubled. Versus Trinity she went 2-3 and drove in the game's only run. Junior Kelly McGuigan who was the designated layer for the Ephs earned the NESCAC Player of the Week honor going 3-10 with 3 RBIs and 2 runs scored. The Ephs enter with a 3-game win streak after winning the NESCAC title this past weekend at Tufts, when they downed the hosts 3-1 in the title tilt and pinning just the fourth loss of the season on Tufts.Įph first year pitcher Sadie Leonard won all three games and she struck out 35 batters in the 3 games and was named the NESCAC Pitcher of the Week as she upped her record to 16-4. The winner of that game will advance to a contest scheduled for 11:00 AM on Friday and play the winner of the second game on Thursday between Salisbury (39-3) and Framingham State (32-11) which is scheduled to begin at 4:30 PM. The first contest in the tournament will feature the Ephs versus UMass Dartmouth (30-12) Thursday with the first pitch scheduled for 2:00 PM. The tournament is being hosted by Salisbury University, the top-ranked team in DIII with a 39-3 record. – Kris Herman's Williams softball team (22-15) and the 2023 NESCAC champions will be one of three New England teams traveling to Salisbury to compete in the NCAA Tournament Thursday.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |